1.0 Point of View Dr. David. D Briske is coming from a scientist’s point of view. As he states in his article, it is his duty and obligation to “fact check” Mr. Allan Savory and his claims, because this issue is his lifelong profession and study (Briske, 2014). He feels it is his responsibility to review the evidence presented by Savory. In the field of science, there are certain methodological frameworks that one must work with another to prove a theory. Given that this is career, you can see his frustration in having to explain why this theory could potentially be more harmful than helpful. "Claims made Mr. Savory in the TED video are unsubstaniated and represent an unfortunate distraction from legitimate and proven procedures, and outcomes of grazing management"(Briske, 2014). In his writings, Dr. Briske is clearly against Mr. Savory’s claims. He makes it known, where the science community stands with these over grazing practices. It is also a dangerous concept to...